|
pheil58 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Geez CUERVO..I'm starting to see a pattern...you LIE a lot...I said "some higher ups knew and let it happen was plausable..(for me}....CD..noplanes..ect...was not....got it?
pheil58 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
CUERVO...It says in your profile that you are 66...you sure it's not 6?
CUERVOBRILLANTE (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Goodnight everyone; sweet dreams!
CUERVOBRILLANTE (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
And the BBC's S+O+U+R+C+E was ... ???
CUERVOBRILLANTE (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Someone has suddenly gone off the word "plausible" - Now I wonder why!? It's on record they said the 9/11 "theory" was that - "plausible" - now the capricious chameleon attempts to deny it said it! ... Perhaps its grey matter has suddenly addled; it's constantly asking for kindergarten-type explanations now, and cannot seem to work things out for itself and needs a second-grader to explain! hehehe! LOL!
SavannahsRUs (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Hehe. 20 minutes is nothing. The Israeli Mossad and the neocons knew 8 weeks prior to the event.
pheil58 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
CUERVO...What is your theory as to why the BBC would be given given advanced information about the demolition by the perps??..Let's start with ONE.. give me one reason why they would do that....
CUERVOBRILLANTE (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
So ... The S+O+U+R+C+E of the once most prestigious broadcasting company on the planet, the astronomical BBC Jane Standley "cock-up" was ... Does ANYONE know? ... Just a little 'hiccup' during a 'confusing' day when millions of tons of skyscrapers turned into talcum powder and imploded into themselves at the bash of a plane? (Oh, sorry, I forgot, NO plane bashed into WTC7) SO, DID Jane Standley INVENT there and then with deja-vu exactitude? Where, what and who was her S+O+U+R+CE?
CUERVOBRILLANTE (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Surprise, surprise! - This odd entity has now currently decided the 9/11 "theory" is NOT even "plausible" after all, either, as it previously stated, just hours ago!I am now invited to get off my second-grader "high horse" LOL! It would "gladly" admit it was wrong, it says, if the day comes; yet in the same breath; "can't buy into it"! Glad-rags or Sackcloth; which would be more appropriate for such an utter, crass blindness IF the scales get pulled off from those unseeing, dim eyes eventually?
pheil58 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
"acceptable:worthy of approval or praise:fair-showing:...as a theory NO not plausable...Get off you high horse CUERVO....My position is this:...Bush is an imbecile..Iraq a horrific mistake....but until I see poof that our government planned ..staged ... and carried aout an operation to blow up the towers ..wtc7...and the Petagon....I just can't buy into it....and by the way, I'm all for an independent investigation...If they find proof then I will gladly admit I have been wrong... |
